I have no intentions to put Ti on my boat ,in any grade for that matter. In my opinion, it doesn't serve the correct means to the end. I only made the comment to give CM a chance to defend themselves, else we only knew one half of the story. I am still not pleased with CM's rationale about "strain rate," as even impact information is only marginally useful as a design criteria; especially when large temperature ranges and harsh environments are involved. Fatigue is only as good as the assumptions made in the analysis, the statistical scatter (which is very large mind you) of the data, and quality level of the samples. Material choice will always be a compromise between conflicting pro's and con's. We just need to make an educated (and I emphasize "educated") decision and be happy with that.
My remaining point is that nothing lasts forever. There is nothing that a new, exotic, and expensive material will overcome regular thorough inspections and maintenance. At some point, what we have is all we need... we just have to take care of it. It was most well stated in "My Old Man and the Sea" by a father and son sailing around Cape Horn. Prudent mariners care more for the well-being of the boat than themselves, b/c without the boat they are nothing... especially in trying times when they must rely on it the most.
Just take care of your boat, and in return it will take care of you.
T.
Oh, believe it or not, in airplane design they account in their designs crack propagation (and I mean visible, order of 3 to 9 mm). This is so when they go around the plane on the regular thorough inspection and maintenance schedule, they can detect fatigue. Ever seen a square riveted at a joint, window, or door? That is patch work... sometimes they get several patches thick.
Think about it... maintenance saves you over time. I know it can be burdensome, but I think it to be worth the effort... there is just too much on the line.